Tidbits
Brought to you courtesy of the 1st Amendment
© YVN
 
SUNNYSIDE (6-24-07)--La Raza does NOT want it made clear that there's a big difference between racism and nationalism. Such clarity disolves their arguments. If you're a racist, you automatically bristle when you see someone else of a different skin color from your own. You back away and turn your head. If you have a room-temperature IQ, you spit, yell and call names. If you're simply a nationalist, you won't allow anyone--foreign or domestic--to change or tear down your country, regardless of how they intend to go about it. Viewed through this lens, take a look at La Raza in the streets, their sly backers in the ACLU and, for that matter, anyone else. Keep the difference between racism and nationalism straight in your head. Smile when La Raza calls you names. But don't give an inch. Take it to 'em. This is YOUR country, Americans. You know who you are.
 
SUNNYSIDE (6-21-07)--If you're a gang member in Sunnyside, WA, (100% la raza say police) you now may be up for a maximum year in jail and $5,000 fine. A parent who "knowingly permits" a child to break the new gang law may also be guilty of a civil infraction and fined $1,000. Ah, but in steps "ACLU spokesman" Doug Honig. According to the Washington BAR Assn., this bird isn't even an attorney. Honig says he's going to "watch" how the new law is enforced. If Honig sets foot in town, he should be nailed under the city's nuisance statutes. In fact, the ACLU has become a left-wing nuisance. The ACLU itself should be sued for aiding and abetting sedition in our country. Good news: Capt. Phil Schenck says he's got calls from cities all across the country who are looking at a similar law in their own jurisdictions. News note: ACLU lawyers, all of whom work for a firm, have been known to make $600 an hour for their extra-curricular "services", bought and paid-for by unseemly special interest groups.
 
 SUNNYSIDE (6-9-07)--Corporate agriculture in Washington State is hauling out its big guns. They're angry that the latest immigration amnesty bill died in Congress. They want Pres. Bush to resurrect the amnesty bill (Bush said today he intends to do just that). Mike Gempler, executive director of the Yakima-based Washington Growers League, said reform groups are "getting a lot of publiciy" and "inaccurately charactrizing the (bill) as amnesty". Gempler indicates big ag is going to retaliate in the press. Some 200 ag businesses and community groups (unnamed) will pay $10,000 for full-page ads in the Tri-City Herald, Yakima Herald Republic, Spokesman Review (Spokane), Wenatchee World, and Walla Walla Union Bulletin. Chances are excellent the ads won't be pro-Minuteman. Sources inside various Minutemen groups vow to get a list of ad buyers and compare it with ICE raid lists.
 
 SUNNYSIDE (6-8-07)--After a half year, Sunnyside PD still refuses to give out precise addresses of those whom it arrests, according to I-Watch, an organization designed to curb gang thuggery on Sunnyside's Harrison Hill.
 
In the past, police have released precise addresses for the press and public.
 
"It appears Sunnyside Police do not intend to (provide the addresses). We can only conclude the PD does not want I-Watch to know where arrestees live. With the new anti-gang ordinance, some persons will be arrested on charges of being gang members. If they're juveniles, we won't know who they are. Nor, given PD policy (not law) we will not know where gang members live."
 
"Meanwhile gangsters literally are taking over Sunnyside, and good members of the community are moving away. Is that what the city wants?" said I-Watch.
 
Sunnyside PD has reportedly stopped giving complete addresses for those whom the agency arrests. The PD has made it impossible for the public to see where suspected criminals live in Sunnyside.
 
I-Watch members say they have a suggestion: "Have the police return to giving house numbers in its arrest reports."
 Enough illegals in WA alone to make up a large city

Based on demographics, the federal INS estimates 136,000 illegal aliens reside in Washington State. Based on its own counts, the state puts the figure at 207,000. Each year, these folks cost state taxpayers an estimated $665 million. That's to educate, incarcerate, and provide medical care for them. If other socialistic perks are included, the figure doubles. Since the feds show little interest in closing the borders or going after those who employ illegals, WA taxpayers may have to pay $1.2 Billion for illegals in 2010, and $2.02 Billion in 2020; these figures again double with other perks. That's just in Washington! For those interested, see the full report from the Washington Policy Center. Included are numbers and costs for all U.S. states. What can YOU do, Ducky?

Americans snap up jobs illegals leave behind

ICE raids recently conducted at Swift meat packing plants revealed Americans snap up jobs illegals leave behind. The day after the raids took place, news stories indicated scores of legal workers were lining up to apply for the jobs left vacant by illegal aliens who fled or were arrested.

Don't expect any money back

Washington state bureaucrats/democrats reaped a $2-Billion tax bonanza recently. It's surplus money which, if the state returned it to the people, would give each taxpayer $416 to spend as he wishes. Chances of the state returninng the money to hard working taxpayers are nil. They're spending the dollars like drunken sailors while holding their hands out for more. Lets hear it for a new state called East Washington.

Supreme Court: You can't ask that question

In 1982, the Supreme Court narrowly (5-4) decided that government service agencies could no longer ask certain questions regarding illegal aliens. Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, makes it illegal for service entities to ask any person whether he entered the country illegally. The decision cut off the only straightforward way to determine how many illegals are in the U.S. At the same time, it gave open borders politicians a way to mask the impact of illegals on the country.

 Have communists made gains in U.S since 1963?

The 1963 Congressional Record reveals 45 major changes the communist party was determined to make in the U.S. some 44 years ago. Did these vermin accomplish what they set out to do? In a word, mostly, yes. Ladies and gentlemen, take the caps off your cockroach spray cans and fire away.
 
Modern indulgences

Before the Renaissance, Catholic Church leaders raked off tidy sums of cash for selling passes (called indulgences) into heaven.

Today, we have a new religion--bogus science. High priests include Al Gore, Hollywood airheads, and environmental wackos. Their modus operandi is the same as that of the old church fathers.

These people demand that each person have a legal limit on the amount of carbon dioxide he can put into the air. If he goes beyond that limit, he commits a "sin". His "carbon footprint" is too big. He may in the future have to pay a fine or extra taxes for his "sins" (Humans exhale carbon dioxide, you know).

Rich, elite leftists, with their 30,000-square-foot mansions, internatonal jet-setting and SUVs, whomp up a lot of CO2. How can they upload all this CO2 and remain environmentally sinless?

Well, we poor schlubs don't put much CO2 into the air. So elite leftists simply claim what's left of our tiny alotments, buying "carbon credits" to assuage their "consciences". It all averages out, you know.

Meanwhile they want to legally coerce the rest of us to cut back on home heating, to drive tiny cars, to walk or ride bikes, and give up motorized lawn mowers. Maybe they need a carbon footprint on their butts.
 
 Gun control: thank Nazis and Democrats

The JPFO--Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership--say Thomas J. Dodd was the Connecticut Democrat who borrowed the Nazi's 1938 gun control law, translated it from German to English and introduced it to Congress. It became America's Gun Control Act of 1968. The 1938 law was enforced by the Gestapo; the 1968 law is enforced by the BATF. Jews didn't fare well under the Nazi law: can Americans fare any better under the democrat version? Stay tuned.

With gun control, only criminals have guns.

According to Ed Chenel, police officer, Victoria, Australia,
it has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by the Australian government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.
 
First-year results are now in:

• Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,

• Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent ;
• Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent.
• In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.
 
While law-abiding citizens turned in their guns, criminals did not. Criminals still possess their guns.
 
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
 
There's also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.
 
Clueless Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in "successfully ridding Australian society of guns."
 
You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the state legislature disseminating this information.
 
The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property. Gun-control laws affect only law-abiding citizens.

Keep an eye out for Wahhabists

Of all Muslim religious sects, it's Wahhabists who really want to behead you, Mr. infidel, to force your wife and daughters into Pelosi-style burkas, and make the U.S. an Islamic state. Wahhabists preach vitriolic hatred in their mosques and might be likened to an agressive cancer. Americans need to keep an eye on them wherever they find them. A valid comparison can be made between today's Jihaudists and Nazis in World War II.

Leftist goals: destruction of U.S. economy--and U.S.

Environmental wackos are a piece of the modern Democrat coalition (Along with "feminazis", racist minority leaders, anti-border- control organizers, Bush haters, and very wealthy manipulators). A prime example of enviro-terrorist success is the northwest spotted owl fiasco which has ruined the lives of thousands of American workers who were dependent on Northwest timber crops. Another is their ongoing attempt, via the judicial system, to tear down Snake River dams, worth billions, which irrigate farms and generate power. A third is their dark, Ducky-Lucky assertion that man, not the sun, is responsible for "global warming" (Mars is heating up, too). Environmental wackos are not only goofy, they're dangerous. The higher-up agenda is to take this country down. Lower-agenda street grunts,"useful idiots", might not even realize what they're doing.