Building
Today Magazine
CHEYENNE--(Saturday
3-25-00)--- County sheriffs in Wyoming insist all
federal law enforcement officers and federal
regulatory personnel clear all their activities in
a Wyoming county with the Sheriffs
Office.
Speaking at a press
conference following the recent U.S. District Court
decision (case No. 2:96-cv-099), Bighorn County
Sheriff Dave
Mattis said
all federal officials are forbidden to enter his
county without his prior approval.
"If a sheriff doesn't
want the Feds in his county, he has the
constitutional power and right to keep them out, or
ask them to leave, or retain them in custody," he
said.
The court decision came
about after Mattis and other members of the Wyoming
Sheriffs Association brought a suit against both
the BATF
and the
IRS
in the Wyoming federal district court seeking
restoration of the protections enshrined in the
United States Constitution and the Wyoming
Constitution.
The District Court
ruled in favor of the sheriffs, stating that
"Wyoming is a sovereign state and the duly elected
sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement
official within a county and has law enforcement
powers exceeding that of any other state or federal
official."
The Wyoming sheriffs
are demanding access to all BATF files to verify
the agency is not violating provisions of Wyoming
law that prohibit the registration of firearms or
keeping of a registry of firearm owners.
The sheriffs are also
demanding that federal agencies immediately cease
the seizure of private property and the impoundment
of private bank accounts without regard to due
process in state courts.
Sheriff Mattis stated,
"I am reacting to the actions of federal employees
who have attempted to deprive citizens of my county
of their privacy, their liberty, and their property
without regard to the constitutional
safeguards.
"I hope that more
sheriffs all across America will join us in
protecting their citizens from the illegal
activities of the IRS, EPA, BATF, FBI, or any other
federal agency that is operating outside the
confines
of constitutional law.
"Employees of the IRS
and EPA are no longer welcome in Bighorn County
unless they intend to operate in conformance with
constitutional law," Mattis said.
This case is evidence
that the Tenth Amendment is not yet dead in the
United States.
It may also be
interpreted to mean that political subdivisions of
a state are included within the meaning of the
amendment, or that the powers exercised by a
sheriff are an extension of those common law powers
which the Tenth Amendment explicitly reserves to
the people, if they are not granted to the federal
government and specifically prohibited to the
states.
--Building Today
magazne